<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bottom Line&#8230;&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seekism.wordpress.com/2005/11/30/the-bottom-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seekism.wordpress.com/2005/11/30/the-bottom-line/</link>
	<description>the act of passionate inquiry....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:13:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: novato</title>
		<link>http://seekism.wordpress.com/2005/11/30/the-bottom-line/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>novato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 01:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seekism.wordpress.com/2005/06/04/the-bottom-line/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Roop,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Oh man I agree wholeheartedly with most of what you say. My own take is a little different on a couple of points, but not the main ones you make.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;d still like to discuss some of these Bible inconsistency issues with you, in part for my own benefit. I don&#039;t ever think about those things. It&#039;s not an issue for me. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What did you think about my explanation for the apparent problem in Luke regarding Cyrenius? Is the &quot;gap&quot; in the record of govenors true? Are the alternate translations of the word &quot;proto&quot; accurate? Either would explain the apparent &quot;inconsistency&quot; and render it null.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Here&#039;s the rub. I&#039;m depending on &quot;experts.&quot; I&#039;m not a Greek scholar or Roman historian. MT could probably come up with his own experts to contradict my experts. I don&#039;t really know if the record has a gap in it. I&#039;ve never examined it. Have you?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But I can understand a Gr. lexicon, and being bilingual, (tri- if you count the heavenly language) I know something about translation. So that argument is plausible and doesn&#039;t require conjecture into the unknown.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now, if the heart and meat of the issue is about the spirit of man (which I agree with), aren&#039;t we back to the realm of subjectivity and experience? I mean, spiritual quantities are largely if not totaly, personal and experiential. Granted, you&#039;ve set some parameters for choosing which parts of the Bible you wish to embrace in what you call &quot;The Teachings of Jesus.&quot; (I love those passages too.) But what about all the other &quot;teachings of Jesus&quot; that you cull out or ignore? I like where you&#039;re going, but when you get down to the bottom line and say, &quot;I believe that the creator put in each of us the ability to know right and wrong&quot; or that we are &quot;inherently good&quot; do you have proof for those convictions or are they just subjective? And if they&#039;re subjective, aren&#039;t they just as useless or useful as what WOFers believe? (Of course you&#039;re not abusive and intolerant, which is a MAJOR distinction. I don&#039;t want to overlook that.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m busy sanding / varnishing a hardwood floor today and tomorrow so I may not get back here to check for a while.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Novato</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roop,</p>
<p>Oh man I agree wholeheartedly with most of what you say. My own take is a little different on a couple of points, but not the main ones you make.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d still like to discuss some of these Bible inconsistency issues with you, in part for my own benefit. I don&#8217;t ever think about those things. It&#8217;s not an issue for me. </p>
<p>What did you think about my explanation for the apparent problem in Luke regarding Cyrenius? Is the &#8220;gap&#8221; in the record of govenors true? Are the alternate translations of the word &#8220;proto&#8221; accurate? Either would explain the apparent &#8220;inconsistency&#8221; and render it null.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the rub. I&#8217;m depending on &#8220;experts.&#8221; I&#8217;m not a Greek scholar or Roman historian. MT could probably come up with his own experts to contradict my experts. I don&#8217;t really know if the record has a gap in it. I&#8217;ve never examined it. Have you?</p>
<p>But I can understand a Gr. lexicon, and being bilingual, (tri- if you count the heavenly language) I know something about translation. So that argument is plausible and doesn&#8217;t require conjecture into the unknown.</p>
<p>Now, if the heart and meat of the issue is about the spirit of man (which I agree with), aren&#8217;t we back to the realm of subjectivity and experience? I mean, spiritual quantities are largely if not totaly, personal and experiential. Granted, you&#8217;ve set some parameters for choosing which parts of the Bible you wish to embrace in what you call &#8220;The Teachings of Jesus.&#8221; (I love those passages too.) But what about all the other &#8220;teachings of Jesus&#8221; that you cull out or ignore? I like where you&#8217;re going, but when you get down to the bottom line and say, &#8220;I believe that the creator put in each of us the ability to know right and wrong&#8221; or that we are &#8220;inherently good&#8221; do you have proof for those convictions or are they just subjective? And if they&#8217;re subjective, aren&#8217;t they just as useless or useful as what WOFers believe? (Of course you&#8217;re not abusive and intolerant, which is a MAJOR distinction. I don&#8217;t want to overlook that.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m busy sanding / varnishing a hardwood floor today and tomorrow so I may not get back here to check for a while.</p>
<p>Novato</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
